Best Loom alternatives in 2026: Top tools compared

5

Loom solves a common pain point: HR personnel or leaders need to train remote team members on on-screen processes. Maybe it’s how to enter data into a shared system. Perhaps it’s how to use new tech. Loom records that on-screen process and the accompanying audiovisual description by the person demonstrating the workflow. It then outputs a polished video tutorial.

And while Loom is a strong option for these scenarios, teams often find that it’s not a viable option for building out an extensive documentation library. Loom’s recording and editing features are slow and limited when creating process guides at scale. Edits are also time-consuming.

Below, we’ll explore the most common reasons teams leave Loom in-depth and the best alternatives for your use case.

Why switch from Loom

Teams typically leave Loom because it isn’t a robust enough tool to cover all of their documentation needs. Here’s where the app falls short.

Limited features: Loom allows teams to record and trim videos, and has a small suite of other editing features, enabling users to add text, captions, or graphics. But those who need deeper functionality will find that Loom can’t keep up with their production needs.
Not an ideal workspace: Loom has a cloud-based library feature and Shared spaces that allow users to organize content with folders and tags. While easy to navigate when teams have a handful of guides, the experience is less intuitive once the library grows and becomes more compartmentalized.
Crashes mean more work: Loom is generally reliable, but when it does crash or stall, teams risk losing their work and having to re-record.
Niche use cases: Strongest in onboarding and training scenarios, Loom’s linear video guides don’t adequately support other common use cases for documentation tools, like the creation of SOPs or customer demos.
Lacks professional editing polish: Users who create customer-facing content find that Loom’s editing and branding features are too limited to generate the studio-grade content that competitor products can.

When Loom is still enough

While Loom has drawbacks in deep documentation or high-production-value use cases, it’s a solid tool for those who prefer simplicity. Individuals or small teams capturing one-off content should find that the tool meets these basic needs and is intuitive enough to start using on day one.

How to choose a Loom alternative

Selecting the right Loom alternative relies on a variety of factors, such as your most common use cases for the tool. Use the following steps to guide your decision.

Define your core use case: No tool is worth investing in if it doesn’t solve your documentation pain point, so the first filter in your search should be determining what you’d need the Loom alternative to do. That might be making product demos or building an SOP documentation library.
Set success metrics: If you’ve outgrown Loom, it’s because the tool wasn’t allowing you to capture and edit content quickly enough, or its collaboration and sharing capacities became unwieldy. So, the alternative tool you’ll choose should improve upon those downsides, and you’ll need metrics to track improvements (think: creating content 30% faster or saving 1 hour per week on document sharing).
Filter by features and compatibility: Once you’ve weeded out tools that won’t satisfy your use case or improvement requirements, filter by features. Look for the editing capacities you need, like custom branding or annotations, and drop tools that don't have them from your list. Also, review basic compatibility. Does the tool function with the browsers and desktop tools you use? Does it work with your operating system, or is it a Windows or macOS-only tool?
Consider pricing: Pricing for screen recording tools generally falls into two categories: feature-based tiered pricing or per-seat pricing, both of which are often billed monthly. Feature-driven pricing gates more extensive functionality behind higher tiers. And per-seat pricing charges a fee for every user and may have minimums or upper limits on how many people can use the tool. You may also find combinations of tiered and per-seat pricing: i.e., a business plan that gives you access to the full feature suite but charges you per user (instead of a team-wide flat fee). Ensure you understand the pricing structure and calculate the total investment, taking into account key factors like user minimums and desired feature access.
Verify output style: Ensure that the tool outputs guides in the format you need them, whether that's a video tutorial or a static SOP-style documentation with images and texts. Check for target file types, too. Some tools primarily support video file exports, while others, like Scribe, have PDF or Markdown options, too.
Check for workflow fit: One of the key reasons that scaling teams leave Loom is that finding documentation is difficult on its cloud-based platform. Find a tool that permits you to save information in a centralized, searchable location that's also easy to navigate. And ensure that the platform permits you to share outputs via links or embeds, so that you can move guides to collaborative spaces like Notion or Confluence. You'll also want to review permissions and access to be able to filter which members of your team can edit or view guides.
Demo finalists: Once you have a shortlist, use a free trial or demo to explore the product. Ask team members who will regularly use the tool to run a typical documentation workflow in it and provide feedback. Ultimately, you want these daily users to find the tool intuitive and comprehensive enough to aid their work. Without their buy-in, adoption can fail.

Best Loom alternatives at a glance

.comparison-table th,
.comparison-table td {
padding: 12px 16px;
text-align: left;
border-bottom: 1px solid #e5e7eb;
vertical-align: top;
}

.comparison-table th:first-child,
.comparison-table td:first-child {
font-weight: 600;
white-space: nowrap;
}

.comparison-table thead th {
background-color: #f9fafb;
font-weight: 600;
font-size: 13px;
color: #374151;
border-bottom: 2px solid #e5e7eb;
}

.comparison-table tbody tr:nth-child(even) {
background-color: #f9fafb;
}

.comparison-table tbody tr:hover {
background-color: #f3f4f6;
}

.highlight-row td {
background-color: #eff6ff !important;
}

.highlight-row:hover td {
background-color: #dbeafe !important;
}

.badge {
display: inline-block;
padding: 2px 8px;
border-radius: 4px;
font-size: 12px;
font-weight: 500;
white-space: nowrap;
}

.badge-yes {
background-color: #dcfce7;
color: #166534;
}

.badge-trial {
background-color: #fef9c3;
color: #854d0e;
}

.badge-no {
background-color: #f3f4f6;
color: #6b7280;
}

.badge-free {
background-color: #dcfce7;
color: #166534;
}
</style>

<table class="comparison-table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Tool</th>
<th>Recording type</th>
<th>Editing depth</th>
<th>Hosted share link</th>
<th>Free plan</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="highlight-row">
<td>Scribe</td>
<td>Step-by-step guide (no video required)</td>
<td>N/A — auto-generates guides</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Free</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UserGuiding UG Now</td>
<td>Interactive guide</td>
<td>Light</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Trial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Soapbox</td>
<td>Video</td>
<td>Light</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Free</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CloudApp</td>
<td>Video + image + GIF</td>
<td>Light</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Free</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Iorad</td>
<td>Interactive guide</td>
<td>Medium</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Trial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Camtasia</td>
<td>Video</td>
<td>Advanced</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>Trial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tella</td>
<td>Video</td>
<td>Light–medium</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Free</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VEED</td>
<td>Video</td>
<td>Medium</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Free</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vidyard</td>
<td>Video</td>
<td>Light</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Free</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OBS Studio</td>
<td>Video</td>
<td>None built-in</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>Free</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

Best Loom alternatives by use case

Use case is the primary filter for shortlisting viable products. Here's which Loom alternatives to consider based on how you intend to use the tool.

Best for process documentation and SOPs: Scribe is built to handle scaled documentation. As a Workflow AI platform, Scribe functions as a workspace where teams can create a structured, searchable documentation library. Scribe's one-click capture enables users to record any on-screen process, and the platform automatically transforms it into a polished step-wise static, video, or scroll-style guide, complete with screenshots and annotations. Scribe guides can be embedded in Confluence or Notion or shared via a shareable link, and any time you recapture a workflow, Scribe updates all instances of the guide automatically. Scribe also goes a step further than many traditional screen recording tools with analytics on the efficacy of the workflows it captures. These pinpointed insights help business leaders uncover process bottlenecks and redundancies that waste resources and employee time, so that they can devise optimizations.
Best for interactive walkthroughs: UG Now and Iorad transform step-by-step guides into interactive walkthroughs that users can follow while interacting with an on-screen tool. The guide will tell viewers where to click or type, providing tips along the way. These platforms are ideal for training scenarios in which reinforcing the correct execution of a process helps people learn.
Best for presenter-led guides: One of Loom's core differentiators is that its videos are presenter-led. If you're seeking an alternative that preserves this functionality, try Tella. This screen recorder produces polished outputs via a user-friendly, intuitive interface with minimal to no editing.
Best for lightweight recording: Scribe has both a browser extension and a desktop tool that run quietly in the background of your work, so that you can focus on capturing a process correctly instead of interacting with the recording dashboard.
Best for sales outreach: Vidyard is designed for sales and marketing teams that want to send leads and clients personalized video messages. The platform has built-in analytics on how viewers engage with videos, which helps sales teams understand where their product or messaging resonates best. Vidyard's integrations are also sales-forward, linking up with CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot.
Best for record-and-edit flows: VEED is a software-free, browser-based video creation tool that enables users to record their screen or webcam and edit the output directly in the browser. The editing functions are sufficient, but not as deep as those on heavier software-based tools.
Best for high production value: Camtasia allows teams to create professional-grade tutorial content with its comprehensive video editor. Users can record on their screen or webcam, and Camtasia keeps audio and video tracks separate. They then edit a multi-track timeline, with tracks for video, audio, music, and annotations.
Best for studio-style editing: OBS Studio is a free and open-source screen studio and live streaming software, primarily for video producers and podcasters. Its comprehensive editing features enable users to construct scenes from multiple audiovisual tracks, cutting between shots.

Do more with Scribe

Loom is a strong video creation tool, most successful in training and async communication scenarios. But it's not intended for heavy documentation. So, teams using Loom will need a more high-powered alternative when creating onboarding tutorials or SOPs at scale.

Scribe is that tool and more. Scribe captures browser and desktop workflows, automatically creating polished guides that you can share or embed with one click or house in the platform's centralized workspace. You never have to edit guides (unless you want to), and when a workflow changes, you simply recapture it, and Scribe updates all existing documentation so your team is never working from stale information. Scribe will even help you determine where your workflows get stuck, so that you can make data-driven decisions on improvements.

Try Scribe for free and learn how it can transform your documentation processes, saving you time and increasing accuracy.

FAQs

What is the best free Loom alternative?

The best free Loom alternative depends primarily on your use case. If you plan to document processes at scale, get started with Scribe's free plan, which will allow you to create unlimited browser-based, step-by-step guides. If you want to record and edit screen and webcam content, use OBS Studio, which is free and has a comprehensive editing suite, even if the learning curve is steep. And if you primarily need video-based screen recording, use Tella's free trial or VEED's free plan until you hit the feature ceiling.

What is the best Loom alternative for sales teams?

Vidyard is the best alternative for sales and marketing projects, as it was built for these use cases and can create personalized video messages for consumers or clients. It also integrates with everyday sales tools and provides engagement analytics that support sales and marketing decision-making.

Is there a Loom alternative that generates step-by-step guides instead of video?

Scribe generates step-by-step guides with annotations, steps, and screenshots, and you can also choose to animate the guide in a movie or scroll. Static guides tend to be faster to create than video content, as you don't need to record every time you make a mistake or spend extensive time editing. And, when your processes change, you don't have to re-record and edit; you can simply use Scribe to recapture the workflow and automatically update all existing instances of the guide.

Can I use Scribe as a Loom alternative for internal communication?

Yes. Scribe is efficient at communicating the steps of workflows via its guides, which the platform updates automatically when you make changes to processes. And because guides are stored in a single, searchable location, your team always has access to the most up-to-date best practices and processes. Plus, you can add AI voiceovers to your Scribe tutorials, which is a similar communication functionality to the human presenter feature Loom offers.

‍

Ready to try Scribe?

Scribe automatically creates and shares step-by-step guides.  Work smarter and faster. Turn processes into playbooks in seconds.

Try Scribe free

The Context Maturity Curve

Take assessment

The standard for centralizing processes

Scribe is your single source of truth for all processes. Reduce the time teams spend documenting, verifying and sharing processes by 93%.

Talk to Sales

Ready to try Optimize?

Scribe Optimize helps you see how work happens across every team and tool, and get insights and recommendations to make it better.

Request a demo